Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Qual usar, quando
Estes são dois níveis da mesma linha Claude, não gêmeos: a Anthropic posiciona o claude-opus-5-5 como o nível superior, construído para codificação agêntica de longa duração e trabalho de conhecimento, e o claude-sonnet-5-5 como o nível inferior, que ela lista como mais rápido. No papel, eles compartilham um contexto de 1000000 tokens, saída máxima de 128000, entrada de texto e imagem e leituras de cache a $0.2, de modo que a tabela de preços reflete a diferença de nível: o claude-opus-5-5 custa $4 para entrada e $20 para saída, 2x o claude-sonnet-5-5 a $2 e $10. Coloque o tráfego de alto volume e sensível à latência no claude-sonnet-5-5, e envie as tarefas agênticas longas e difíceis para o claude-opus-5-5.
Benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 5.5: o fornecedor não publicou resultados de benchmark.
Publicado pelos fornecedores: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic DeepSeek Google Moonshot OpenAI Z.ai
Preços
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entrada / 1M tokens | $4 | $2 | 2× |
| Saída / 1M tokens | $20 | $10 | 2× |
| Leitura de cache / 1M tokens | $0.2 | $0.2 | = |
| Escrita de cache | 1.25x (5m) / 2x (1h) | 1.25x (5m) / 2x (1h) | - |
Tarifas do catálogo em tempo real no momento do build; a página de cada modelo contém o cartão atual.
Onde eles se posicionam - preço de entrada por 1M tokens entre todos os 76 modelos de chat nesta unidade de cobrança (escala logarítmica)
Capacidades
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Uso de ferramentas | sim | sim |
| Controle de raciocínio | sempre ativo | sempre ativo |
| Saída estruturada | sim | sim |
| Cache de prompt | explícito (você marca o prefixo) | explícito (você marca o prefixo) |
| Tempo de vida do cache | 5m default, 1h option | 5m default, 1h option |
| Prefixo mínimo em cache | 1024 tokens | 1024 tokens |
Especificações
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Modalidades de entrada | texto imagem | texto imagem |
| Modalidades de saída | texto | texto |
| Lançamento | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-28 |
| Corte de conhecimento | 2026-06 | 2026-06 |
| Janela de contexto | 1M | 1M |
| Saída máxima | 128K | 128K |
| Parâmetro de raciocínio | output_config.effort | thinking.type |
| Valores aceitos | output_config.effort
| thinking.type
|
| Padrão | medium | adaptive, effort high |
As especificações são transcritas da documentação de cada fornecedor; uma linha que um fornecedor não publica é omitida em vez de ser inferida. Fontes completas: Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5
Um prompt, ambos os modelos - medidos pelo gateway
Claude Opus 5.5 passou · 3 sentences
When we turned on reasoning, the model began "thinking out loud" before each answer, generating thousands of internal working tokens that users never see but that we are billed for just like the final response. Those hidden tokens are charged at the output rate, typically the most expensive rate, so the same question with the same visible answer now costs roughly twice as much or more. We can bring the bill back down without losing the quality gains by capping the reasoning budget and reserving reasoning mode for the complex tasks that actually benefit from it.
saída 263 tok (+102 pensamento) latência 5.7 s
Claude Sonnet 5.5 passou · 3 sentences
Enabling reasoning makes the model "think" before it answers, and that internal thinking is generated as extra text (reasoning tokens) that we are billed for at the same rate as output tokens, even though users never see it. Output tokens also cost several times more than input tokens, so a single request that used to produce a short answer can now generate many times more billable text behind the scenes. Because our request volume and prompts didn't change, the doubling comes almost entirely from this hidden thinking, and we can bring it down by limiting reasoning effort, turning it off for simple tasks, and reserving it for the workloads where the accuracy gain justifies the cost.
saída 205 tok latência 3.6 s
Cumprimento da instrução (exatamente três frases - contáveis), ajuste ao público (registro de CFO), e a lacuna de cobrança do pensamento oculto que os medidores de tokens abaixo expõem.
Claude Opus 5.5 passou · 8/8 cases
```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 best = max(best, cur) else: cur = 1 return best ``` **Explanation:** The original code counted *matching adjacent pairs* rather than *items in a run*. Both `cur` and `best` started at 0, and `cur` reset to 0 on a mismatch, so a run of length *n* was reported as *n − 1*. For a single-element list the loop never executes, so it returned 0 instead of 1. For `[5, 5]` it returned 1 instead of 2. The fix treats every element as the start of a run of length 1: `best` and `cur` start at 1, and `cur` resets to 1 (not 0) when the value changes. An explicit check returns 0 for an empty list. The "misses runs at the last index" reports are the same off-by-one bug rather than a separate one. […]
saída 723 tok (+303 pensamento) latência 10.4 s
Claude Sonnet 5.5 passou · 8/8 cases
**The bug:** `cur` counts the number of *adjacent equal pairs* rather than the number of items in the run. A run of length k contains only k−1 such pairs, so every result is one too small. The counter also starts at 0 and the loop starts at index 1, so a single-element list never updates `best` and returns 0 instead of 1. (An empty list should return 0.) In addition, `cur` resets to 0 on a mismatch, when it should reset to 1, because the item at `xs[i]` begins a new run of length 1. The claim that it "misses runs ending at the last index" is really the same off-by-one: the final run is counted, but as one less than its true length. Because `best` is updated inside the loop on every extension, the last run isn't skipped. […]
saída 444 tok latência 6.7 s
Se a correção é de fato certa (executável), a densidade da explicação, e a eficiência em tokens numa tarefa delimitada.
Claude Opus 5.5 passou · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending Q4 close"
```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": "Withheld pending Q4 close" } ``` **Judgment calls to check:** - **quarter**: Kept as "September quarter" rather than "Q3", since the fiscal calendar isn't stated. The text mentions an upcoming "Q4 close," so it may be fiscal Q3, but that's not certain. - **revenue_usd_m**: The text says only "412 for the topline." It doesn't state currency or units, and the figure is on a constant-currency basis, not reported USD. USD millions is an assumption. Use `null` if you need strictly stated values. - **growth_pct**: The source says "eleven and change," so the true figure is slightly above 11. 11 is an approximation. - **guidance**: Guidance was explicitly withheld. I recorded that rather than `null`, since the text addresses it directly.
saída 829 tok (+488 pensamento) latência 10.9 s
Claude Sonnet 5.5 passou · 5/5 fields, guidance null
Here is the extracted JSON: ```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": null } ``` Notes on the choices: - **quarter**: The text says "September quarter" without specifying a fiscal year or Q-number, so I kept the wording as stated. - **revenue_usd_m**: The text gives "412" for the topline, with no currency or unit stated explicitly. I've taken it as 412 million USD per the field definition, but the text does not confirm that, and the figure is constant-currency. - **growth_pct**: "Eleven and change" means slightly above 11, so 11 is an approximation. The exact figure isn't given. - **guidance**: Guidance is withheld pending the Q4 close, so no guidance is stated, hence null.
saída 300 tok latência 3.5 s
Obediência ao esquema (sem campos inventados), pressão de alucinação (guidance é explicitamente retida), e diferenças no caminho de saída estruturada.
Claude Opus 5.5 passou · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question
Today we're launching Cross-Provider Prompt Caching for our API gateway. Why pay twice for the same context? Our gateway now stores repeated prompt prefixes, system instructions, and document chunks, then reuses them whether your request goes to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or an open-source model. Teams running retrieval pipelines or long agent loops can cut token costs by up to 60 percent and trim latency on every cached call. Setup takes one configuration flag; no code changes are required. Cache rules respect tenant boundaries, expire on your schedule, and log every hit for audit review. Dashboards show savings by provider, route, and application in real time. Cross-Provider Prompt Caching is available on all Pro and Enterprise plans. Turn it on today.
saída 1263 tok (+1007 pensamento) latência 13.5 s
Claude Sonnet 5.5 passou · 122 words, 0 banned, 1 question
**Introducing Cross-Provider Prompt Caching** Your API gateway now caches prompts across every connected LLM provider, whether you route traffic to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or a self-hosted model. Here's how it works: the gateway fingerprints each prompt prefix, stores it centrally, and applies the right provider-specific caching mechanism automatically. When you switch providers or fail over during an outage, your cached context follows you. Early testing shows input token costs dropping by up to 70% on repeated system prompts and long documents, with latency improvements of 40% or more on cache hits. Tired of paying to send the same instructions thousands of times a day? Enable it with one configuration flag. Cache rules, TTLs, and per-team isolation are available in the dashboard today.
saída 266 tok latência 3.8 s
Obediência às restrições (orçamento de palavras, lista de palavras proibidas, a única pergunta), impressão digital de estilo, e controle de comprimento.
Alterne entre eles com uma linha
Ambos os IDs estão em todas as abas abaixo - o par de linhas destacado é a única edição. Mesmo endpoint, mesma chave, mesmo formato de requisição.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
api_key="sk-syn-...",
)
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
model="claude-opus-5-5",
# model="claude-sonnet-5-5", # descomente esta linha, comente a linha acima
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)import OpenAI from "openai";
const client = new OpenAI({
baseURL: "https://synthorai.io/v1",
apiKey: "sk-syn-...",
});
const resp = await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "claude-opus-5-5",
// model: "claude-sonnet-5-5", // descomente esta linha, comente a linha acima
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Summarize this diff" }],
reasoning_effort: "medium",
});
console.log(resp.choices[0].message.content);curl https://synthorai.io/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-syn-..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "claude-opus-5-5",
# "model": "claude-sonnet-5-5", # descomente esta linha, comente a linha acima
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
"reasoning_effort": "medium"
}'package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"github.com/openai/openai-go/v3"
"github.com/openai/openai-go/v3/option"
)
func main() {
client := openai.NewClient(
option.WithBaseURL("https://synthorai.io/v1"),
option.WithAPIKey("sk-syn-..."),
)
resp, _ := client.Chat.Completions.New(context.TODO(), openai.ChatCompletionNewParams{
Model: "claude-opus-5-5",
// Model: "claude-sonnet-5-5", // descomente esta linha, comente a linha acima
Messages: []openai.ChatCompletionMessageParamUnion{
openai.UserMessage("Summarize this diff"),
},
ReasoningEffort: openai.ReasoningEffortMedium,
})
fmt.Println(resp.Choices[0].Message.Content)
}import com.openai.client.OpenAIClient;
import com.openai.client.okhttp.OpenAIOkHttpClient;
import com.openai.models.chat.completions.*;
import com.openai.models.ReasoningEffort;
OpenAIClient client = OpenAIOkHttpClient.builder()
.baseUrl("https://synthorai.io/v1")
.apiKey("sk-syn-...")
.build();
ChatCompletion resp = client.chat().completions().create(
ChatCompletionCreateParams.builder()
.model("claude-opus-5-5")
// .model("claude-sonnet-5-5") // descomente esta linha, comente a linha acima
.addUserMessage("Summarize this diff")
.reasoningEffort(ReasoningEffort.MEDIUM)
.build());
System.out.println(resp.choices().get(0).message().content().orElse(""));FAQ
Qual é mais barato, Claude Opus 5.5 ou Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 é mais barato em entrada / 1m tokens ($2 vs $4, com 2.0× de diferença). Outras linhas podem apontar para o outro lado - a tabela acima traz o quadro completo, e o custo real depende do seu mix.
Posso fazer um teste A/B de Claude Opus 5.5 contra Claude Sonnet 5.5 sem duas integrações?
Sim. Ambos são servidos pelo mesmo endpoint compatível com OpenAI com uma única chave de API - a troca é uma alteração de uma linha na string do modelo, de modo que você pode rotear uma fração do tráfego para cada um e comparar as faturas diretamente.
Claude Opus 5.5 e Claude Sonnet 5.5 suportam prompt caching?
Sim - ambos cobram leituras em cache abaixo da sua taxa de entrada, então cargas de trabalho com warm-prefix custam menos do que as taxas listadas sugerem. As linhas exatas de leitura em cache estão na tabela de preços acima.