新人 免费注册,送 10 次调用,最高 $1,无需绑卡。

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Claude Fable 5 已从我们的目录下线。下方是它最后公布的价格;这个模型已无法调用,对比中的另一个模型仍可正常调用。

vs

什么时候选哪个

claude-fable-5 在每一个可比项目上的成本比 gemini-3.7-flash 高出约 13.3x:每百万输入 token $10 对比 $0.75,输出 $50 对比 $3.75,缓存读取 $1 对比 $0.075。选择它是为了无法禁用且始终开启的思考功能以及更充裕的回复空间,最高可达 128000 个输出 token,对比 65536。对于大批量工作,或者需要音频或视频输入时,请选择 gemini-3.7-flash,它具有可相媲美的 1048576-token 上下文,对比 1000000。

Benchmark 成绩

领先高于同类均值无更高分Claude Fable 5986 / 9740 / 97Gemini 3.7 Flash317 / 233 / 23

12 项两边都有成绩。

Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.7 Flash 其他参测模型 同类均值 ★ 没有模型得分更高
DeepSWE 1.1
69.7%
65.3%
BioMysteryBench hard
46.5%
43.5%
OSWorld 2.0
66.1%
47.9%
Cybergym
83.1%
N/A
HealthBench Professional
60.9%
N/A
Finance Agent v2
56.3%
59%
Harvey Lab-AA
93.6%
90.7%
GPQA Diamond
92.6%
N/A
Blueprint-Bench 2
38.6%
N/A
AutomationBench (v1.0.6)
46.2%
52.3%
LVBench
N/A
没有模型得分更高 85.4%

供应商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic ByteDance DeepSeek Google MiniMax Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

价格

Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.7 Flash Δ
输入 / 1M token $10 $0.75 13×
输出 / 1M token $50 $3.75 13×
缓存读取 / 1M token $1 $0.075 13×
缓存写入 1.25x (5m) / 2x (1h) - -

价格取自构建时的实时目录,最新价格见各模型页面。

两个模型所处的位置:全部 76 个按同一单位计费的聊天模型的每 1M token 输入价分布(对数刻度)

$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

能力

Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.7 Flash
工具调用 是 是
思考控制 始终开启 是,但供应商未公布调节参数
结构化输出 是 是
提示词缓存 显式(由你标记前缀) 隐式 + 显式
缓存有效期 5m default, 1h option 未公布
最小缓存前缀 1024 个 token 4096 个 token

规格

Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.7 Flash
输入模态 文本 图像 文本 图像 音频 视频
输出模态 文本 文本
发布日期 2026-06-09 2026-08-13
知识截止日期 2026-01 2026-03
上下文窗口 1M 1M
最大输出 128K 66K
思考参数 output_config.effort (thinking.type is adaptive-only and needs no configuration) -
可选值
effort
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max

both "enabled" and "disabled" return 400

-
默认值

thinking always on (adaptive)

effort
  • high
-

规格照录自各供应商的文档;供应商没有公布的项目,对应的行直接省略,不做推断。 完整来源: Claude Fable 5 · Gemini 3.7 Flash

同一条提示词,两个模型,经网关实测

提示词 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 检查 恰好 3 句

Claude Fable 5 通过 · 3 sentences

When we enabled reasoning, the model began generating extensive internal "thinking" tokens before each answer, and those tokens are billed as output even though users never see them. Output tokens typically cost several times more than input tokens, so adding thousands of hidden reasoning tokens per request effectively multiplied our per-query cost. In short, we're paying for a much longer response behind the scenes in exchange for higher answer quality, and we can manage this by tuning reasoning effort levels or reserving reasoning mode for complex tasks only.

输出 228 tok 延迟 6.7 s

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning causes the model to generate a high volume of invisible "thinking tokens" behind the scenes to deliberate and solve complex logic before delivering a final response. Because our vendor bills strictly on token volume, this additional internal computation effectively doubled our billable output per query. In short, our costs increased because we are now paying for the extra compute capacity required to produce significantly higher-accuracy answers.

输出 878 tok (+799 思考) 延迟 6.9 s

指令遵循(恰好三句,数得出来)、受众适配(对 CFO 说话的口吻),以及下方 token 计数暴露出的隐藏思考计费差额。

提示词 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 检查 修复通过测试

Claude Fable 5 通过 · 8/8 cases

## Fixed code ```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` ## Explanation The original function counts **adjacent equal pairs** rather than **items in a run**: a run of length *n* contains only *n − 1* equal neighbor pairs, so every result is off by one — a single-element list yields 0 instead of 1, and `[1, 2, 2]` yields 1 instead of 2 (which callers perceive as "missing" the run at the end). The fix is to initialize both `cur` and `best` to 1 (any nonempty list has a run of at least length 1), reset `cur` to 1 rather than 0 when

输出 531 tok 延迟 12.5 s

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 8/8 cases

Here is the corrected function: ```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` ### Explanation of the Bug The original function tracked equal adjacent transitions instead of the actual number of elements in a run, causing all non-empty run lengths to be undercounted by one (e.g., returning `0` instead of `1` for single-element lists because the loop never executes, and `1` instead of `2` for pairs). Initializing both `best` and `cur` to `1` (after handling empty inputs) and resetting `cur` to `1` on a mismatch ensures every individual element is counted as a valid run of at least length one.

输出 1050 tok (+827 思考) 延迟 6.4 s

修复是否真的正确(能运行)、解释的信息密度,以及在一个范围明确的任务上的 token 效率。

提示词 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 检查 合法 JSON,严格符合 schema

Claude Fable 5 通过 · 5/5 fields, guidance null

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "Q3 (September quarter)", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": null } ``` Notes on interpretation: "up eleven and change" is rendered as 11 (the precise figure isn't stated), and guidance is null because it was explicitly withheld.

输出 192 tok 延迟 6.5 s

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld"

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": null, "guidance": "withheld" } ```

输出 918 tok (+858 思考) 延迟 6.2 s

是否严守 schema(不臆造字段)、能否顶住幻觉压力(原文明说暂不给出 guidance),以及结构化输出路径的差异。

提示词 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 检查 120 词,0 个禁用词

Claude Fable 5 通过 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

**Introducing Cross-Provider Prompt Caching for our API Gateway** Starting today, your repeated prompts are cached once and reused across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and any other provider you route through the gateway. Instead of paying full token costs every time your application sends the same system prompt or context block, the gateway detects matching prefixes and serves cached results in milliseconds. Why keep spending money and latency on identical requests? Early adopters report cost reductions of up to 60 percent on high-volume workloads, along with faster median response times. Configuration is simple: enable caching in your dashboard, set a TTL, and choose which routes participate. Cache entries are encrypted at rest and never shared between accounts. Available now on all plans.

输出 1173 tok 延迟 18.2 s

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Why pay twice for identical AI queries simply because you routed them to different model vendors? Today, we introduce Universal Prompt Caching directly within our unified API gateway architecture. This capability stores repeated prompt contexts across OpenAI, Anthropic, and local models, instantly returning stored results to eliminate redundant computation fees. When your application sends an LLM request, the gateway inspects the payload, identifies semantic matches, and returns accurate cached responses in under ten milliseconds. Engineering teams can now slash inference latency by eighty percent while dramatically reducing monthly token expenditures across diverse production deployments. You retain complete privacy control, flexible cache eviction policies, and granular metrics through a single dashboard. Update your routing settings today to accelerate overall system performance.

输出 2858 tok (+2718 思考) 延迟 14.1 s

是否守住约束(字数预算、禁用词表、只能有一个问句)、文风特征,以及长度控制。

改一行代码就能在两个模型之间切换

下方每个标签页里都有两个模型 ID,高亮的那两行是唯一要改的地方。端点不变,API key 不变,请求结构也不变。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-fable-5",
    # model="gemini-3.7-flash",  # 取消注释此行,注释上一行
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

获取 API key →

常见问题

Claude Fable 5 和 Gemini 3.7 Flash 哪个更便宜?

按「输入 / 1M token」算,Gemini 3.7 Flash 更便宜($0.75 对 $10,相差 13×)。其他计费项的结论可能相反,完整价格见上方表格,实际成本取决于你的用量构成。

不用分别集成两次,就能对 Claude Fable 5 和 Gemini 3.7 Flash 做 A/B 测试吗?

可以。两个模型走同一个 OpenAI 兼容端点,用同一个 API key,切换时只要改一行里的模型名,所以可以给两个模型各分一部分流量,直接对比账单。

Claude Fable 5 和 Gemini 3.7 Flash 支持提示词缓存吗?

支持。两个模型的缓存读取价都低于各自的输入价,所以前缀能反复命中缓存的负载,实际成本会比按官网价估算的低。具体的缓存读取价见上方价格表。

相关对比

我们的实测研究