Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol

vs

什么时候选哪个

两种模型均涵盖聊天、视觉、代码、工具和推理,并具备大约一百万 token 的上下文(gemini-3.7-flash 为 1048576,gpt-6-sol 为 1050000),因此区别主要在于价格、模态和输出空间。对于每百万输入 $0.75 和输出 $3.75(两者都比 gpt-6-sol 便宜约 2.7 倍)的更便宜大批量工作,以及当您需要其接受而 gpt-6-sol 不接受的音频或视频输入时,请选择 gemini-3.7-flash。当您希望每次响应多达 128000 个输出 token 或能够关闭思考时,请选择输入为 $2 且输出为 $10 的 gpt-6-sol。

Benchmark 成绩

高于同类均值无更高分Gemini 3.7 Flash17 / 243 / 24GPT-6 Sol仅 4 项可比
Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol 其他参测模型 同类均值 ★ 没有模型得分更高
DeepSWE 1.1
65.3%
68.8%
BioMysteryBench hard
43.5%
N/A
OSWorld 2.0
47.9%
N/A
Finance Agent v2
59%
N/A
Harvey Lab-AA
90.7%
N/A
HLE-Verified
53.6%
N/A
AutomationBench (v1.0.6)
52.3%
33.2%
LVBench
没有模型得分更高 85.4%
N/A

供应商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic DeepSeek Google Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

价格

Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol Δ
输入 / 1M token $0.75 $2 0.38×
输出 / 1M token $3.75 $10 0.38×
缓存读取 / 1M token $0.075 $0.2 0.37×
缓存写入 - 1.25x (30m) / 2.5x (12h) -

价格取自构建时的实时目录,最新价格见各模型页面。

两个模型所处的位置:全部 83 个按同一单位计费的聊天模型的每 1M token 输入价分布(对数刻度)

Gemini 3.7 Flash · $0.75 GPT-6 Sol · $2
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

能力

Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol
工具调用 是 是
思考控制 是,但供应商未公布调节参数 可配置
结构化输出 是 是
提示词缓存 隐式 + 显式 隐式 + 显式
缓存有效期 未公布 at least 30m by default, 12h option on the Responses API
最小缓存前缀 4,096 个 token 1,024 个 token

规格

Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol
输入模态 文本 图像 音频 视频 文本 图像
输出模态 文本 文本
发布日期 2026-08-13 2026-09-22
知识截止日期 2026-03 2026-04
上下文窗口 1M 1.1M
最大输出 66K 128K
思考参数 - reasoning.effort
可选值 -
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
默认值 - medium

规格照录自各供应商的文档;供应商没有公布的项目,对应的行直接省略,不做推断。 完整来源: Gemini 3.7 Flash · GPT-6 Sol

同一条提示词,两个模型,经网关实测

提示词 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 检查 恰好 3 句

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning causes the model to generate a high volume of invisible "thinking tokens" behind the scenes to deliberate and solve complex logic before delivering a final response. Because our vendor bills strictly on token volume, this additional internal computation effectively doubled our billable output per query. In short, our costs increased because we are now paying for the extra compute capacity required to produce significantly higher-accuracy answers.

输出 878 tok (+799 思考) 延迟 6.9 s

GPT-6 Sol 通过 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning made the model generate extra internal tokens to work through each request, and those tokens are billed even though users don’t see them. If request volume stayed roughly the same, more billed tokens per request could explain why the bill doubled. We should check the usage breakdown to confirm, then lower reasoning effort or limit it to tasks that need it.

输出 188 tok (+111 思考) 延迟 5.0 s

指令遵循(恰好三句,数得出来)、受众适配(对 CFO 说话的口吻),以及下方 token 计数暴露出的隐藏思考计费差额。

提示词 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 检查 修复通过测试

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 8/8 cases

Here is the corrected function: ```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` ### Explanation of the Bug The original function tracked equal adjacent transitions instead of the actual number of elements in a run, causing all non-empty run lengths to be undercounted by one (e.g., returning `0` instead of `1` for single-element lists because the loop never executes, and `1` instead of `2` for pairs). Initializing both `best` and `cur` to `1` (after handling empty inputs) and resetting `cur` to `1` on a mismatch ensures every individual element is counted as a valid run of at least length one.

输出 1050 tok (+827 思考) 延迟 6.4 s

GPT-6 Sol 通过 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The original `cur` counted matching *adjacent pairs*, not items, so every run was one too short—including a single-element input, which returned 0. Starting each run at 1 counts its first item, and updating `best` on every iteration ensures a run that reaches the last index is included.

输出 206 tok (+59 思考) 延迟 5.9 s

修复是否真的正确(能运行)、解释的信息密度,以及在一个范围明确的任务上的 token 效率。

提示词 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 检查 合法 JSON,严格符合 schema

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld"

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": null, "guidance": "withheld" } ```

输出 918 tok (+858 思考) 延迟 6.2 s

GPT-6 Sol 通过 · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending the Q4 close"

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":null,"growth_pct":null,"guidance":"Withheld pending the Q4 close"}

输出 227 tok (+185 思考) 延迟 5.2 s

是否严守 schema(不臆造字段)、能否顶住幻觉压力(原文明说暂不给出 guidance),以及结构化输出路径的差异。

提示词 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 检查 120 词,0 个禁用词

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通过 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Why pay twice for identical AI queries simply because you routed them to different model vendors? Today, we introduce Universal Prompt Caching directly within our unified API gateway architecture. This capability stores repeated prompt contexts across OpenAI, Anthropic, and local models, instantly returning stored results to eliminate redundant computation fees. When your application sends an LLM request, the gateway inspects the payload, identifies semantic matches, and returns accurate cached responses in under ten milliseconds. Engineering teams can now slash inference latency by eighty percent while dramatically reducing monthly token expenditures across diverse production deployments. You retain complete privacy control, flexible cache eviction policies, and granular metrics through a single dashboard. Update your routing settings today to accelerate overall system performance.

输出 2858 tok (+2718 思考) 延迟 14.1 s

GPT-6 Sol 通过 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today, we’re introducing cross-provider prompt caching for our API gateway, helping teams reuse repeated prompt content when routing requests among supported AI providers. The gateway identifies eligible prompt prefixes, stores cache references, and applies them to subsequent requests where provider capabilities allow. Why send the same context again if it can be reused? With fewer duplicate input tokens, applications can reduce costs and improve latency without changing how developers call the gateway. Configure caching by route, monitor hit rates and savings in your dashboard, and keep existing provider fallback rules in place. Availability and cache behavior vary by provider, so the gateway reports eligibility and usage for each request. Get started today with our documentation and test your existing workloads.

输出 586 tok (+443 思考) 延迟 7.7 s

是否守住约束(字数预算、禁用词表、只能有一个问句)、文风特征,以及长度控制。

改一行代码就能在两个模型之间切换

下方每个标签页里都有两个模型 ID,高亮的那两行是唯一要改的地方。端点不变,API key 不变,请求结构也不变。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemini-3.7-flash",
    # model="gpt-6-sol",  # 取消注释此行,注释上一行
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

获取 API key →

常见问题

Gemini 3.7 Flash 和 GPT-6 Sol 哪个更便宜?

按「输入 / 1M token」算,Gemini 3.7 Flash 更便宜($0.75 对 $2,相差 2.7×)。其他计费项的结论可能相反,完整价格见上方表格,实际成本取决于你的用量构成。

不用分别集成两次,就能对 Gemini 3.7 Flash 和 GPT-6 Sol 做 A/B 测试吗?

可以。两个模型走同一个 OpenAI 兼容端点,用同一个 API key,切换时只要改一行里的模型名,所以可以给两个模型各分一部分流量,直接对比账单。

Gemini 3.7 Flash 和 GPT-6 Sol 支持提示词缓存吗?

支持。两个模型的缓存读取价都低于各自的输入价,所以前缀能反复命中缓存的负载,实际成本会比按官网价估算的低。具体的缓存读取价见上方价格表。

相关对比

我们的实测研究