🎁 New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

gpt-image-1.5 vs GPT Image 2

vs

Which one, when — curated verdict, not a benchmark table

Input costs the same $5 per million on both and output is within a rounding error ($32 against $30), so price is not the reason to choose. gpt-image-2 widens the frame: arbitrary sizes with edges up to 3840x2160 in multiples of 16 at ratios up to 3:1, against a fixed 1024x1024 / 1536x1024 / 1024x1536 / auto set on gpt-image-1.5. Pick gpt-image-1.5 only if you want text back alongside the image — it lists text among its outputs where gpt-image-2 is image-out only; otherwise take the resolutions.

Pricing

gpt-image-1.5 GPT Image 2 Δ
Input / 1M tokens $5 $5 =
Output / 1M tokens $32 $30 1.1×

Rates from the live catalog at build time; each model page carries the current card.

Where they sit — output price per 1M tokens across all 8 image-generation models on this billing unit (log scale)

Specs

gpt-image-1.5 GPT Image 2
Input modalities text image text image
Output modalities text image image
Released 2026-02-10 2026-04-21
Output sizes
  • 1024x1024
  • 1536x1024
  • 1024x1536
  • auto
  • 1024x1024
  • 1536x1024
  • 1024x1536
  • 2048x2048
  • 2048x1152
  • 3840x2160
  • 2160x3840
  • auto
  • arbitrary WxH (both divisible by 16, aspect ratio 1:3–3:1)
Input modes text-to-image, image edit with mask inpainting text-to-image, image edit with mask inpainting
Images per request 10 10
Formats png, jpeg, webp png, jpeg, webp
Notes

1024x1024 / 1024x1536 / 1536x1024, quality low/medium/high

edits endpoint supported

better instruction following than gpt-image-1

Flexible resolutions: edges up to 3840px in multiples of 16, ratio <=3:1, ~0.65-8.3MP total (incl. 4K 3840x2160)

editing with mask inpainting

all image inputs processed at high fidelity

significantly improved text rendering (precise placement can still struggle)

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: gpt-image-1.5 · GPT Image 2

One prompt, both models — measured through the gateway

PROMPT A weathered enamel diner mug on a steel counter, the words "OPEN 24H" stencilled on the mug in worn paint, low winter sun raking in from the left, shallow depth of field.

gpt-image-1.5

gpt-image-1.5: A weathered enamel diner mug on a steel counter, the words "OPEN 24H" stencilled on the mug in worn paint, low winter sun raking in from the left, shallow depth of field.

Model returned 1024×1024 latency 20 s

GPT Image 2

GPT Image 2: A weathered enamel diner mug on a steel counter, the words "OPEN 24H" stencilled on the mug in worn paint, low winter sun raking in from the left, shallow depth of field.

Model returned 1402×1122 latency 18 s

One prompt, one request per model, no retries and no cherry-picking — the first result each model returned. Neither size nor duration was pinned: each model used its own default, because a request shaped to fit all of them would flatter none. Files here are re-encoded for the web, so judge composition and prompt adherence, not compression.

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below — the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.images.generate(
    model="gpt-image-1.5",
    # model="gpt-image-2",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    prompt="a watercolor lighthouse at dawn",
    size="1024x1024",
)
print(resp.data[0].b64_json[:80])

Get an API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, gpt-image-1.5 or GPT Image 2?

They list the same input / 1m tokens ($5), so price does not decide this one — see the specs and capabilities below.

Can I A/B test gpt-image-1.5 against GPT Image 2 without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key — switching is a one-line model-string change, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Does the price change with image size?

It depends on how the model bills. Per-image models charge the same regardless of prompt or output size; token-billed models scale with the resolution you render, so a 4K image costs a multiple of a small one. The table above shows which applies to each.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies