GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max

vs

什麼情況選哪一個

這兩者在事實規格上相當接近:兩者皆接收文字與圖片輸入,回傳文字,並涵蓋對話、視覺、程式碼、工具與推理功能,且每百萬輸入 token 皆收費 $2,因此差異在於輸出,其中 gpt-6-sol 的 $10 大約是 qwen3.8-max 的 $6 的 1.67 倍。若是偏重輸出的工作,在脈絡長度幾乎相同(983616 對 1050000 token)且上限稍大(131072 token)的情況下,請選擇 qwen3.8-max;當你想要有停用思考功能的選項、更便宜的 $0.2 快取讀取,或是額外的脈絡餘裕時,請選擇 gpt-6-sol。

Benchmark 成績

高於平均沒有模型更高GPT-6 Sol僅 4 項可比Qwen3.8 Max31 / 408 / 40
GPT-6 Sol Qwen3.8 Max 其他有成績的模型 其他模型平均 ★ 沒有模型分數更高
DeepSWE 1.1
68.8%
56.6%
AndroidBench
N/A
75.1%
Cybergym
N/A
78.5%
HealthBench
N/A
沒有模型分數更高 60.2%
JobBench
N/A
53.4%
PLawBench
N/A
沒有模型分數更高 73.2%
GPQA Diamond
N/A
92.6%
Agents' Last Exam
56.4%
27%

供應商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic ByteDance DeepSeek Google MiniMax Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

定價

GPT-6 Sol Qwen3.8 Max Δ
輸入 / 1M tokens $2 $2 =
輸出 / 1M tokens $10 $6 1.7×
快取讀取 / 1M tokens $0.2 $0.25 0.8×
快取寫入 1.25x (30m) / 2.5x (12h) 1.25x -

費率取自網站建置時的即時目錄;各模型頁面都列有最新的價目。

兩者的相對位置:每 1M tokens 的輸入價格,涵蓋同一計費單位下全部 83 個聊天模型(對數尺度)

GPT-6 Sol · $2 Qwen3.8 Max · $2
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

功能

GPT-6 Sol Qwen3.8 Max
工具使用 是 是
思考控制 可設定 是,但供應商未公布調整參數
結構化輸出 是 是
提示詞快取 隱式 + 顯式 隱式 + 顯式
快取存活時間 at least 30m by default, 12h option on the Responses API explicit: 5m, reset on hit
最小快取前綴 1,024 個 token 1,024 個 token

規格

GPT-6 Sol Qwen3.8 Max
輸入模態 文字 圖像 文字 圖像
輸出模態 文字 文字
發布日期 2026-09-22 2026-08-03
知識截止日期 2026-04 -
上下文視窗 1.1M 984K
最大輸出 128K 131K
思考參數 reasoning.effort -
可接受的值
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
-
預設值 medium -

規格摘錄自各供應商的文件;供應商沒有公布的項目就直接略過,不自行推測。 完整來源: GPT-6 Sol · Qwen3.8 Max

同一段提示詞,兩個模型,經閘道實測

提示詞 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 檢查 恰好 3 句

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning made the model generate extra internal tokens to work through each request, and those tokens are billed even though users don’t see them. If request volume stayed roughly the same, more billed tokens per request could explain why the bill doubled. We should check the usage breakdown to confirm, then lower reasoning effort or limit it to tasks that need it.

輸出 188 tok (+111 思考) 延遲 5.0 s

Qwen3.8 Max 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning makes the model produce additional hidden steps before responding, and those tokens are billable. It also tends to lengthen each interaction because the model works through more possibilities before settling on an answer. Therefore, the bill doubled mainly due to higher compute and token usage per request, not necessarily because the number of requests doubled.

輸出 378 tok (+305 思考) 延遲 8.6 s

是否照指令做(剛好三句,數得出來)、語氣是否貼合對象(寫給 CFO 看),以及下方 token 計量顯示出的隱藏思考計費落差。

提示詞 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 檢查 修正後通過測試

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The original `cur` counted matching *adjacent pairs*, not items, so every run was one too short—including a single-element input, which returned 0. Starting each run at 1 counts its first item, and updating `best` on every iteration ensures a run that reaches the last index is included.

輸出 206 tok (+59 思考) 延遲 5.9 s

Qwen3.8 Max 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The bug is that the original code starts `best` and `cur` at `0`, so it counts adjacent equal *transitions* rather than the number of items in the run. A run of length `n` has only `n - 1` equal-neighbor transitions, so single-element inputs return `0`, and runs that reach the end are undercounted by one. Initializing the current run to `1` for the first element, resetting it to `1` on a break, and updating `best` from that count fixes the off-by-one.

輸出 1616 tok (+1411 思考) 延遲 34.7 s

修正是否真的正確(跑得起來)、說明的資訊密度,以及在範圍明確的任務上的 token 效率。

提示詞 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 檢查 有效的 JSON,完全符合 schema

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending the Q4 close"

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":null,"growth_pct":null,"guidance":"Withheld pending the Q4 close"}

輸出 227 tok (+185 思考) 延遲 5.2 s

Qwen3.8 Max 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance null

{ "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": null }

輸出 1199 tok (+1141 思考) 延遲 24.4 s

是否遵守 schema(不自創欄位)、面對幻覺誘因的表現(題目明確不給 guidance),以及結構化輸出路徑的差異。

提示詞 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 檢查 120 詞,0 個禁用詞

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today, we’re introducing cross-provider prompt caching for our API gateway, helping teams reuse repeated prompt content when routing requests among supported AI providers. The gateway identifies eligible prompt prefixes, stores cache references, and applies them to subsequent requests where provider capabilities allow. Why send the same context again if it can be reused? With fewer duplicate input tokens, applications can reduce costs and improve latency without changing how developers call the gateway. Configure caching by route, monitor hit rates and savings in your dashboard, and keep existing provider fallback rules in place. Availability and cache behavior vary by provider, so the gateway reports eligibility and usage for each request. Get started today with our documentation and test your existing workloads.

輸出 586 tok (+443 思考) 延遲 7.7 s

Qwen3.8 Max 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today, our API gateway adds prompt caching across major model providers. It stores prompts and responses in one fast cache layer. Teams can lower token spend, reduce latency, and repeat reliable answers. The feature supports OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Mistral through one configuration. You can set retention rules, scope access, and invalidate entries quickly. How does your team maintain consistent results during provider outages? Approved cached responses keep applications stable while fallback routes recover. The dashboard shows hit rates, savings, latency, and provider usage. Engineers receive audit trails for every cached prompt, enabling safer testing. Product managers can compare cost trends before and after cache adoption. Start with a small route, then safely expand caching to production traffic right now.

輸出 2744 tok (+2591 思考) 延遲 46.3 s

是否遵守限制(字數上限、禁用詞清單、只能有一句問句)、文字風格的特徵,以及長度控制。

改一行程式碼就能在兩者之間切換

下面每個頁籤都列了這兩個模型 ID,要改的只有醒目標示的那兩行。端點、金鑰和請求格式都不變。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-6-sol",
    # model="qwen3.8-max",  # 取消這一行的註解,並把上一行註解掉
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

取得 API 金鑰 →

常見問題

GPT-6 Sol 和 Qwen3.8 Max 哪個比較便宜?

兩者的「輸入 / 1M tokens」相同($2),這一項分不出高下,請看下方的規格與功能。

可以只串接一次,就對 GPT-6 Sol 和 Qwen3.8 Max 做 A/B 測試嗎?

可以。兩個模型都走同一個 OpenAI 相容端點,用的也是同一把 API 金鑰,切換時只要改一行裡的模型名稱字串。你可以把一部分流量分別導到兩邊,再直接比較帳單。

GPT-6 Sol 與 Qwen3.8 Max 支援提示詞快取嗎?

支援。兩者的快取讀取費率都低於輸入費率,所以前綴已經進快取的工作負載,實際成本會比官網價算出來的低。確切的快取讀取價格請見上方定價表。

相關比較