新帳號 免費註冊,送 10 次呼叫,最高 $1,免綁卡。

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

vs

什麼情況選哪一個

就我們掌握的事實而言,gpt-5.6 和 gpt-5.6-sol 無法區分:每百萬輸入 $5、輸出 $30、快取讀取 $0.5 完全相同,同為 1050000 token 脈絡和 128000 token 最大輸出,同樣是文字加影像進、文字出,同樣的對話、視覺、程式碼、工具和推理標誌,思考同樣可選,同為 2026-07-09 發布、2026-02 知識截止。同類負載選哪個都行,把它們當作可互換;按目錄之外的因素來定,比如可用性,或者你的技術棧已經指向哪個 id。

Benchmark 成績

GPT-5.6:供應商沒有公布 benchmark 成績。

高於平均沒有模型更高GPT-5.6 Sol94 / 12128 / 121
GPT-5.6 GPT-5.6 Sol 其他有成績的模型 其他模型平均 ★ 沒有模型分數更高
SWE-Bench Pro
N/A
64.6%
BioMysteryBench hard
N/A
44.7%
OSWorld-Verified
N/A
83%
Cybergym
N/A
84.5%
HealthBench Professional
N/A
60.5%
Finance Agent v2
N/A
53.8%
Harvey Lab-AA
N/A
87.2%
GPQA Diamond
N/A
94.6%
BrowseComp
N/A
90.4%
LVBench
N/A
82.1%

供應商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic ByteDance DeepSeek Google MiniMax Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

定價

GPT-5.6 GPT-5.6 Sol Δ
輸入 / 1M tokens $5 $5 =
輸出 / 1M tokens $30 $30 =
快取讀取 / 1M tokens $0.5 $0.5 =
快取寫入 不額外計費 不額外計費 -

費率取自網站建置時的即時目錄;各模型頁面都列有最新的價目。

兩者的相對位置:每 1M tokens 的輸入價格,涵蓋同一計費單位下全部 76 個聊天模型(對數尺度)

GPT-5.6 · $5 GPT-5.6 Sol · $5
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

功能

GPT-5.6 GPT-5.6 Sol
工具使用 是 是
思考控制 可設定 可設定
結構化輸出 是 是
提示詞快取 隱式(自動) 隱式(自動)
快取存活時間 5-10m, up to 1h 5-10m, up to 1h
最小快取前綴 1024 個 token 1024 個 token

規格

GPT-5.6 GPT-5.6 Sol
輸入模態 文字 圖像 文字 圖像
輸出模態 文字 文字
發布日期 2026-07-09 2026-07-09
知識截止日期 2026-02 2026-02
上下文視窗 1.1M 1.1M
最大輸出 128K 128K
思考參數 reasoning.effort reasoning.effort
可接受的值
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
預設值 medium medium

規格摘錄自各供應商的文件;供應商沒有公布的項目就直接略過,不自行推測。 完整來源: GPT-5.6 · GPT-5.6 Sol

同一段提示詞,兩個模型,經閘道實測

提示詞 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 檢查 恰好 3 句

GPT-5.6 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning makes the model generate many additional internal tokens before producing an answer, so each request consumes substantially more compute. Those reasoning tokens are billed even though they are not visible to users, and longer processing can also increase tool calls, retries, and output length. The bill doubled because our cost per request rose, not necessarily because usage volume increased; we can control it by limiting reasoning effort and routing simpler tasks to cheaper models.

輸出 126 tok (+30 思考) 延遲 3.0 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning makes the model generate additional internal tokens before producing an answer, so each request consumes more billable compute. Reasoning may also increase response length, latency, tool calls, and retries, further raising per-request cost. In short, usage volume may be unchanged, but the cost per task increased enough to double the bill.

輸出 111 tok (+34 思考) 延遲 2.3 s

是否照指令做(剛好三句,數得出來)、語氣是否貼合對象(寫給 CFO 看),以及下方 token 計量顯示出的隱藏思考計費落差。

提示詞 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 檢查 修正後通過測試

GPT-5.6 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: best = max(best, cur) cur = 1 return max(best, cur) ``` The original code counted equal *transitions* rather than items, so a run of one had length `0`, a run of three had length `2`, and tracking from zero caused the off-by-one error. The corrected version starts each run at length `1`, resets to `1` when the value changes, and performs a final `max` after the loop so a run ending at the last element is included; an empty input still returns `0`.

輸出 277 tok (+93 思考) 延遲 4.2 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The original function counted equal *adjacencies* rather than items, so a run of length one produced `0` and every longer run was undercounted by one. Initializing `cur` and `best` to `1` for nonempty input makes them represent item counts, resetting `cur` to `1` starts a new run at the current item, and updating `best` on every iteration ensures a run reaching the final index is included.

輸出 316 tok (+135 思考) 延遲 5.2 s

修正是否真的正確(跑得起來)、說明的資訊密度,以及在範圍明確的任務上的 token 效率。

提示詞 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 檢查 有效的 JSON,完全符合 schema

GPT-5.6 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld pending the Q4 close"

{ "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": null, "guidance": "withheld pending the Q4 close" }

輸出 179 tok (+118 思考) 延遲 3.7 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld pending the Q4 close"

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":412,"growth_pct":"11+","guidance":"withheld pending the Q4 close"}

輸出 194 tok (+147 思考) 延遲 3.2 s

是否遵守 schema(不自創欄位)、面對幻覺誘因的表現(題目明確不給 guidance),以及結構化輸出路徑的差異。

提示詞 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 檢查 120 詞,0 個禁用詞

GPT-5.6 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today we are introducing Prompt Cache, a new API gateway feature that stores reusable prompt prefixes and serves them across supported model providers. By recognizing identical system instructions, tools, examples, and context blocks, Prompt Cache reduces repeated input processing, lowers latency, and helps control token costs without changing application code. Teams can configure retention windows, cache keys, provider routing, encryption, and regional storage policies from one dashboard or API. What happens when a preferred provider is unavailable? The gateway can route requests to another provider while reusing eligible cached content, preserving performance and consistency. Built-in metrics report hit rates, savings, latency, and provider usage, while audit logs support governance. Prompt Cache is available today in public preview for all customers.

輸出 628 tok (+473 思考) 延遲 7.3 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today, we’re introducing Provider Prompt Cache, a new API gateway feature that reuses prompt prefixes across supported AI providers, reducing latency, token costs, and duplicated processing. Teams can define cache policies once, route requests dynamically, and preserve provider flexibility without rewriting application logic. Switching models during testing or failover? The gateway identifies eligible prompt segments, applies provider-specific caching controls, and reports hits, misses, savings, and expiration details through unified logs and metrics. Configurable TTLs, tenant isolation, encryption, and cache-bypass options help teams balance performance, privacy, and freshness for every workload. Provider Prompt Cache is available today in beta through the dashboard and API, with SDK examples and migration guidance included. […]

輸出 733 tok (+564 思考) 延遲 7.7 s

是否遵守限制(字數上限、禁用詞清單、只能有一句問句)、文字風格的特徵,以及長度控制。

改一行程式碼就能在兩者之間切換

下面每個頁籤都列了這兩個模型 ID,要改的只有醒目標示的那兩行。端點、金鑰和請求格式都不變。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-5.6",
    # model="gpt-5.6-sol",  # 取消這一行的註解,並把上一行註解掉
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

取得 API 金鑰 →

常見問題

GPT-5.6 和 GPT-5.6 Sol 哪個比較便宜?

兩者的「輸入 / 1M tokens」相同($5),這一項分不出高下,請看下方的規格與功能。

可以只串接一次,就對 GPT-5.6 和 GPT-5.6 Sol 做 A/B 測試嗎?

可以。兩個模型都走同一個 OpenAI 相容端點,用的也是同一把 API 金鑰,切換時只要改一行裡的模型名稱字串。你可以把一部分流量分別導到兩邊,再直接比較帳單。

GPT-5.6 與 GPT-5.6 Sol 支援提示詞快取嗎?

支援。兩者的快取讀取費率都低於輸入費率,所以前綴已經進快取的工作負載,實際成本會比官網價算出來的低。確切的快取讀取價格請見上方定價表。

相關比較