Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol

vs

什麼情況選哪一個

兩款模型皆具備聊天、視覺、程式碼、工具與推理功能,並提供約一百萬個 token 的上下文(gemini-3.7-flash 為 1048576,gpt-6-sol 為 1050000),因此差異主要在於價格、模態與輸出空間。當進行較便宜的大批量工作(每百萬輸入 $0.75 且輸出 $3.75,兩者皆比 gpt-6-sol 低約 2.7x),或是需要 gpt-6-sol 不接受的音訊或視訊輸入時,請選擇 gemini-3.7-flash。當您需要每次回覆高達 128000 個輸出 token 或具備停用思考功能的能力時,請選擇輸入 $2 且輸出 $10 的 gpt-6-sol。

Benchmark 成績

高於平均沒有模型更高Gemini 3.7 Flash17 / 243 / 24GPT-6 Sol僅 4 項可比
Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol 其他有成績的模型 其他模型平均 ★ 沒有模型分數更高
DeepSWE 1.1
65.3%
68.8%
BioMysteryBench hard
43.5%
N/A
OSWorld 2.0
47.9%
N/A
Finance Agent v2
59%
N/A
Harvey Lab-AA
90.7%
N/A
HLE-Verified
53.6%
N/A
AutomationBench (v1.0.6)
52.3%
33.2%
LVBench
沒有模型分數更高 85.4%
N/A

供應商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic DeepSeek Google Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

定價

Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol Δ
輸入 / 1M tokens $0.75 $2 0.38×
輸出 / 1M tokens $3.75 $10 0.38×
快取讀取 / 1M tokens $0.075 $0.2 0.37×
快取寫入 - 1.25x (30m) / 2.5x (12h) -

費率取自網站建置時的即時目錄;各模型頁面都列有最新的價目。

兩者的相對位置:每 1M tokens 的輸入價格,涵蓋同一計費單位下全部 83 個聊天模型(對數尺度)

Gemini 3.7 Flash · $0.75 GPT-6 Sol · $2
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

功能

Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol
工具使用 是 是
思考控制 是,但供應商未公布調整參數 可設定
結構化輸出 是 是
提示詞快取 隱式 + 顯式 隱式 + 顯式
快取存活時間 未公布 at least 30m by default, 12h option on the Responses API
最小快取前綴 4,096 個 token 1,024 個 token

規格

Gemini 3.7 Flash GPT-6 Sol
輸入模態 文字 圖像 音訊 影片 文字 圖像
輸出模態 文字 文字
發布日期 2026-08-13 2026-09-22
知識截止日期 2026-03 2026-04
上下文視窗 1M 1.1M
最大輸出 66K 128K
思考參數 - reasoning.effort
可接受的值 -
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
預設值 - medium

規格摘錄自各供應商的文件;供應商沒有公布的項目就直接略過,不自行推測。 完整來源: Gemini 3.7 Flash · GPT-6 Sol

同一段提示詞,兩個模型,經閘道實測

提示詞 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 檢查 恰好 3 句

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning causes the model to generate a high volume of invisible "thinking tokens" behind the scenes to deliberate and solve complex logic before delivering a final response. Because our vendor bills strictly on token volume, this additional internal computation effectively doubled our billable output per query. In short, our costs increased because we are now paying for the extra compute capacity required to produce significantly higher-accuracy answers.

輸出 878 tok (+799 思考) 延遲 6.9 s

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning made the model generate extra internal tokens to work through each request, and those tokens are billed even though users don’t see them. If request volume stayed roughly the same, more billed tokens per request could explain why the bill doubled. We should check the usage breakdown to confirm, then lower reasoning effort or limit it to tasks that need it.

輸出 188 tok (+111 思考) 延遲 5.0 s

是否照指令做(剛好三句,數得出來)、語氣是否貼合對象(寫給 CFO 看),以及下方 token 計量顯示出的隱藏思考計費落差。

提示詞 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 檢查 修正後通過測試

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通過 · 8/8 cases

Here is the corrected function: ```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` ### Explanation of the Bug The original function tracked equal adjacent transitions instead of the actual number of elements in a run, causing all non-empty run lengths to be undercounted by one (e.g., returning `0` instead of `1` for single-element lists because the loop never executes, and `1` instead of `2` for pairs). Initializing both `best` and `cur` to `1` (after handling empty inputs) and resetting `cur` to `1` on a mismatch ensures every individual element is counted as a valid run of at least length one.

輸出 1050 tok (+827 思考) 延遲 6.4 s

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The original `cur` counted matching *adjacent pairs*, not items, so every run was one too short—including a single-element input, which returned 0. Starting each run at 1 counts its first item, and updating `best` on every iteration ensures a run that reaches the last index is included.

輸出 206 tok (+59 思考) 延遲 5.9 s

修正是否真的正確(跑得起來)、說明的資訊密度,以及在範圍明確的任務上的 token 效率。

提示詞 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 檢查 有效的 JSON,完全符合 schema

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld"

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": null, "guidance": "withheld" } ```

輸出 918 tok (+858 思考) 延遲 6.2 s

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending the Q4 close"

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":null,"growth_pct":null,"guidance":"Withheld pending the Q4 close"}

輸出 227 tok (+185 思考) 延遲 5.2 s

是否遵守 schema(不自創欄位)、面對幻覺誘因的表現(題目明確不給 guidance),以及結構化輸出路徑的差異。

提示詞 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 檢查 120 詞,0 個禁用詞

Gemini 3.7 Flash 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Why pay twice for identical AI queries simply because you routed them to different model vendors? Today, we introduce Universal Prompt Caching directly within our unified API gateway architecture. This capability stores repeated prompt contexts across OpenAI, Anthropic, and local models, instantly returning stored results to eliminate redundant computation fees. When your application sends an LLM request, the gateway inspects the payload, identifies semantic matches, and returns accurate cached responses in under ten milliseconds. Engineering teams can now slash inference latency by eighty percent while dramatically reducing monthly token expenditures across diverse production deployments. You retain complete privacy control, flexible cache eviction policies, and granular metrics through a single dashboard. Update your routing settings today to accelerate overall system performance.

輸出 2858 tok (+2718 思考) 延遲 14.1 s

GPT-6 Sol 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today, we’re introducing cross-provider prompt caching for our API gateway, helping teams reuse repeated prompt content when routing requests among supported AI providers. The gateway identifies eligible prompt prefixes, stores cache references, and applies them to subsequent requests where provider capabilities allow. Why send the same context again if it can be reused? With fewer duplicate input tokens, applications can reduce costs and improve latency without changing how developers call the gateway. Configure caching by route, monitor hit rates and savings in your dashboard, and keep existing provider fallback rules in place. Availability and cache behavior vary by provider, so the gateway reports eligibility and usage for each request. Get started today with our documentation and test your existing workloads.

輸出 586 tok (+443 思考) 延遲 7.7 s

是否遵守限制(字數上限、禁用詞清單、只能有一句問句)、文字風格的特徵,以及長度控制。

改一行程式碼就能在兩者之間切換

下面每個頁籤都列了這兩個模型 ID,要改的只有醒目標示的那兩行。端點、金鑰和請求格式都不變。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemini-3.7-flash",
    # model="gpt-6-sol",  # 取消這一行的註解,並把上一行註解掉
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

取得 API 金鑰 →

常見問題

Gemini 3.7 Flash 和 GPT-6 Sol 哪個比較便宜?

以「輸入 / 1M tokens」來看,Gemini 3.7 Flash 比較便宜($0.75 對 $2,相差 2.7×)。其他項目的結果可能相反,完整價目請看上表;實際成本要看你的用量組合。

可以只串接一次,就對 Gemini 3.7 Flash 和 GPT-6 Sol 做 A/B 測試嗎?

可以。兩個模型都走同一個 OpenAI 相容端點,用的也是同一把 API 金鑰,切換時只要改一行裡的模型名稱字串。你可以把一部分流量分別導到兩邊,再直接比較帳單。

Gemini 3.7 Flash 與 GPT-6 Sol 支援提示詞快取嗎?

支援。兩者的快取讀取費率都低於輸入費率,所以前綴已經進快取的工作負載,實際成本會比官網價算出來的低。確切的快取讀取價格請見上方定價表。

相關比較