新帳號 免費註冊,送 10 次呼叫,最高 $1,免綁卡。

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) vs GLM-5.2

vs

什麼情況選哪一個

兩者都有 1,000,000 token 上下文和文字進、文字出輪廓,支援聊天、程式碼、推理和工具,所以分野其實是輸出長度和價格,而 deepseek-v4-pro-0813 現在兩項都領先:輸入 $1.32 對 $1.4,輸出 $3.96 對 $4.4,都略低於 glm-5.2;快取讀取 $0.132 對 $0.26,便宜約 2 倍;輸出上限 393216 token 對 131072。單次回覆必須很長或快取重用很重時選 deepseek-v4-pro-0813。想要長上下文標誌或按請求關閉思考時選 glm-5.2。

Benchmark 成績

領先高於平均沒有模型更高DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)1813 / 211 / 21GLM-5.2025 / 801 / 80

兩邊都有成績的有 18 項。

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) GLM-5.2 其他有成績的模型 其他模型平均 ★ 沒有模型分數更高
DeepSWE 1.1
62.7%
46.2%
Cybergym
83.3%
77.2%
GDPval-AA v2 Elo · 1508-1769 據 Z.ai 公布 · 2026-09-04
1590
1508
Harvey Lab-AA
N/A
91%
GPQA Diamond
92.4%
91.2%
Agents' Last Exam
25.7%
23.8%

供應商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic ByteDance DeepSeek Google MiniMax Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

定價

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) GLM-5.2 Δ
輸入 / 1M tokens $1.32 $1.4 0.94×
輸出 / 1M tokens $3.96 $4.4 0.9×
快取讀取 / 1M tokens $0.132 $0.26 0.51×
快取寫入 不額外計費 - -

費率取自網站建置時的即時目錄;各模型頁面都列有最新的價目。

兩者的相對位置:每 1M tokens 的輸入價格,涵蓋同一計費單位下全部 76 個聊天模型(對數尺度)

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) · $1.32 GLM-5.2 · $1.4
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

功能

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) GLM-5.2
工具使用 是 是
思考控制 一律開啟 可設定
結構化輸出 是 是
提示詞快取 隱式(自動) 隱式(自動)
快取存活時間 no fixed TTL (evicted when unused) 未公布
最小快取前綴 未公布 未公布

規格

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) GLM-5.2
輸入模態 文字 文字
輸出模態 文字 文字
發布日期 2026-08-13 2026-06-16
上下文視窗 1M 1M
最大輸出 393K 131K
思考參數 reasoning_effort
  • thinking.type
  • reasoning_effort
可接受的值
reasoning_effort
  • the model card documents low
  • high
  • max
thinking.type
  • enabled
  • disabled
reasoning_effort
  • none
  • minimal
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max (none and minimal skip thinking, low and medium map to high, xhigh maps to max)
預設值 - enabled, with reasoning_effort at max: the only GLM with an effort dial, and it defaults to the top of it

規格摘錄自各供應商的文件;供應商沒有公布的項目就直接略過,不自行推測。 完整來源: DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) · GLM-5.2

同一段提示詞,兩個模型,經閘道實測

提示詞 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 檢查 恰好 3 句

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning causes the model to generate a hidden chain-of-thought with many additional tokens before producing the final answer, which sharply increases compute consumption per request. Those extra reasoning tokens are billed at the same or higher rates, so total usage doubled even though the volume of final outputs stayed similar. We can control this by adjusting reasoning effort, setting token limits, or routing only complex requests through reasoning mode.

輸出 308 tok (+226 思考) 延遲 5.1 s

GLM-5.2 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning means the LLM now generates thousands of invisible "thinking" tokens to systematically work through complex problems before producing a final answer. Because our cloud providers bill for these internal processing steps at the same rate as standard output, our billable token volume per query has doubled. While this increases our direct API costs, it drastically reduces error rates and manual review labor, ultimately lowering our total cost per resolved transaction.

輸出 1223 tok (+1138 思考) 延遲 17.1 s

是否照指令做(剛好三句,數得出來)、語氣是否貼合對象(寫給 CFO 看),以及下方 token 計量顯示出的隱藏思考計費落差。

提示詞 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 檢查 修正後通過測試

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The bug is that `cur` was initialized to `0` and only counted adjacent matching pairs, so a run of length `n` produced `n - 1` (or `0` for a single element) instead of `n`. The code also reset to `0` on a change, when the new run should start at length `1`. Initializing `cur` and `best` to `1` fixes both the single-element case and runs ending at the last index.

輸出 1315 tok (+1130 思考) 延遲 16.9 s

GLM-5.2 未通過 · 1/8 cases (fails [1])

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 […]

輸出 4097 tok (+4036 思考) 延遲 58.4 s

修正是否真的正確(跑得起來)、說明的資訊密度,以及在範圍明確的任務上的 token 效率。

提示詞 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 檢查 有效的 JSON,完全符合 schema

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance null

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":412,"growth_pct":11.0,"guidance":null}

輸出 2155 tok (+2121 思考) 延遲 26.0 s

GLM-5.2 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld"

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": "withheld" } ```

輸出 1947 tok (+1893 思考) 延遲 30.9 s

是否遵守 schema(不自創欄位)、面對幻覺誘因的表現(題目明確不給 guidance),以及結構化輸出路徑的差異。

提示詞 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 檢查 120 詞,0 個禁用詞

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 通過 · 121 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Introducing cross-provider prompt caching in our API gateway. Send a prompt once, and the gateway stores its computed prefix across Anthropic, OpenAI, and other LLM providers. Subsequent requests with the same prompt hit the cache, cutting latency and token costs while keeping outputs consistent across routing decisions and provider failovers. Teams can route identical prompts between providers without reprocessing shared context or lengthy system instructions. How much could you save on repeated prompt prefixes? The cache respects provider-specific key formats, handles TTLs automatically, and works with streaming and batch requests. Enable it with one configuration flag—no changes to your application code. Available today on all plans. Monitor cache hit rates, token savings, and provider-specific performance metrics in the live dashboard.

輸出 2845 tok (+2694 思考) 延遲 25.5 s

GLM-5.2 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

We are introducing Caching for our API Gateway, the smartest way to optimize your workflows. Why pay for the exact same response twice? Now, you can automatically store and reuse prompt results across multiple AI providers, drastically reducing latency and overall operational costs. If a user submits a duplicate query, the gateway serves the cached answer instantly, regardless of whether you route to OpenAI, Anthropic, or others. This directly translates to faster applications and significantly lower monthly API bills. You can easily configure your specific caching rules within the developer dashboard and watch your efficiency soar. Stop wasting your valuable tokens on completely redundant computations. Upgrade to the latest gateway version today and experience the future of intelligent prompt management.

輸出 11125 tok (+10984 思考) 延遲 114.8 s

是否遵守限制(字數上限、禁用詞清單、只能有一句問句)、文字風格的特徵,以及長度控制。

改一行程式碼就能在兩者之間切換

下面每個頁籤都列了這兩個模型 ID,要改的只有醒目標示的那兩行。端點、金鑰和請求格式都不變。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek-v4-pro-0813",
    # model="glm-5.2",  # 取消這一行的註解,並把上一行註解掉
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

取得 API 金鑰 →

常見問題

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 和 GLM-5.2 哪個比較便宜?

以「輸入 / 1M tokens」來看,DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 比較便宜($1.32 對 $1.4,相差 1.1×)。其他項目的結果可能相反,完整價目請看上表;實際成本要看你的用量組合。

可以只串接一次,就對 DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 和 GLM-5.2 做 A/B 測試嗎?

可以。兩個模型都走同一個 OpenAI 相容端點,用的也是同一把 API 金鑰,切換時只要改一行裡的模型名稱字串。你可以把一部分流量分別導到兩邊,再直接比較帳單。

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) 與 GLM-5.2 支援提示詞快取嗎?

支援。兩者的快取讀取費率都低於輸入費率,所以前綴已經進快取的工作負載,實際成本會比官網價算出來的低。確切的快取讀取價格請見上方定價表。

相關比較