🎁 New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

Seedream 4.5 vs Seedream 5.0 Lite

vs

Which one, when — curated verdict, not a benchmark table

The newer seedream-5-0-260128 is also the cheaper one, $0.035 per call against $0.04, and it widens output to 2K/3K/4K with custom sizes from 2560x1440 up to 4096x4096 at ratios to 16:1, where seedream-4-5-251128 offers 2K and 4K only. It also returns png as well as jpeg. Reference handling is identical — 2–14 references, up to 15 images per request — so there is no case for the older model beyond reproducing output you already shipped.

Pricing

Seedream 4.5 Seedream 5.0 Lite Δ
Per generated image $0.04 $0.035 1.1×

Rates from the live catalog at build time; each model page carries the current card.

Where they sit — price per generated image across all 8 image-generation models on this billing unit (log scale)

Seedream 4.5 · $0.04 Seedream 5.0 Lite · $0.035
$0.03 · qwen-image-3.0 $0.075 · qwen-image-2.0-pro

Specs

Seedream 4.5 Seedream 5.0 Lite
Input modalities text image text image
Output modalities image image
Released 2025-12 2026-01
Output sizes
  • 2K
  • 4K
  • 2K
  • 3K
  • 4K
  • custom WxH (total pixels 2560x1440 – 4096x4096, ratio 1:16–16:1)
Input modes text-to-image, single-image image-to-image, multi-reference image-to-image (2–14 refs), batch/sequential image sets text-to-image, single-image image-to-image, multi-reference image-to-image (2–14 refs), batch/sequential image sets
Images per request 15 15
Formats jpeg png, jpeg
Notes

2K/4K output, jpeg

text-to-image, single and multi-reference image-to-image, batch generation

improved text rendering and multi-image consistency

500 max IPM

2K/3K/4K output, png/jpeg

text-to-image + single/multi-reference image editing

batch generation with reference + generated images <=15

500 max IPM

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: Seedream 4.5 · Seedream 5.0 Lite

One prompt, both models — measured through the gateway

PROMPT A weathered enamel diner mug on a steel counter, the words "OPEN 24H" stencilled on the mug in worn paint, low winter sun raking in from the left, shallow depth of field.

Seedream 4.5

Seedream 4.5: A weathered enamel diner mug on a steel counter, the words "OPEN 24H" stencilled on the mug in worn paint, low winter sun raking in from the left, shallow depth of field.

Model returned 2048×2048 latency 9 s

Seedream 5.0 Lite

Seedream 5.0 Lite: A weathered enamel diner mug on a steel counter, the words "OPEN 24H" stencilled on the mug in worn paint, low winter sun raking in from the left, shallow depth of field.

Model returned 2048×2048 latency 25 s

One prompt, one request per model, no retries and no cherry-picking — the first result each model returned. Neither size nor duration was pinned: each model used its own default, because a request shaped to fit all of them would flatter none. Files here are re-encoded for the web, so judge composition and prompt adherence, not compression.

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below — the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.images.generate(
    model="seedream-4-5-251128",
    # model="seedream-5-0-260128",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    prompt="a watercolor lighthouse at dawn",
    size="1024x1024",
)
print(resp.data[0].b64_json[:80])

Get an API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Seedream 4.5 or Seedream 5.0 Lite?

Seedream 5.0 Lite is cheaper on per generated image ($0.035 vs $0.04, 1.1× apart). Other rows may point the other way — the table above carries the full card, and real cost depends on your mix.

Can I A/B test Seedream 4.5 against Seedream 5.0 Lite without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key — switching is a one-line model-string change, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Does the price change with image size?

It depends on how the model bills. Per-image models charge the same regardless of prompt or output size; token-billed models scale with the resolution you render, so a 4K image costs a multiple of a small one. The table above shows which applies to each.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies