New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

GPT-4o Transcribe vs GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

vs

Which one, when

Same $2.5 per million text input and the same 16000-token context; the diarize variant charges a little more for audio ($6.25 against $6 per million audio input tokens) and far less for text output ($2.5 against $10). What it adds is speaker diarization with diarized_json - speaker labels and segment timestamps - at the cost of requiring chunking_strategy above 30 seconds and dropping prompt support. Pick gpt-4o-transcribe for plain streaming transcripts, the diarize variant when you need to know who spoke.

Benchmarks

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize: the vendor has not published benchmark scores.

Above averageGPT-4o Transcribeonly 1 comparable
GPT-4o Transcribe GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize other models measured peer average ★ no peer scored higher
WenetSpeech test-net (CER)
15.3%
N/A

Vendor-published: Alibaba (Qwen) ByteDance Google OpenAI

Pricing

GPT-4o Transcribe GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize Δ
Audio input / 1M tokens $6 $6.25 0.96×
Text output / 1M tokens $10 $2.5 4×

Rates from the live catalogue at build time; each model page carries the current rate card.

Capabilities

GPT-4o Transcribe GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize
Speaker diarization no yes
Streaming yes yes
Timestamps no yes

Specs

GPT-4o Transcribe GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize
Input modalities text audio text audio
Output modalities text text
Released 2025-03-20 2025-10
Knowledge cutoff 2024-06 2024-06
Limits

mp3/mp4/mpeg/mpga/m4a/wav/webm, up to 25MB

streaming transcription supported (incl. Realtime transcription sessions)

json/text output only

no word timestamps or diarization

mp3/mp4/mpeg/mpga/m4a/wav/webm, up to 25MB

built-in speaker diarization with diarized_json output (speaker labels + segment timestamps)

chunking_strategy required for audio >30s

no prompt support

Languages

57 languages listed for the transcriptions endpoint (one shared list for all transcription models)

ISO 639-1 / 639-3 codes accepted for GPT-4o-based models

57 languages listed for the transcriptions endpoint (one shared list for all transcription models)

ISO 639-1 / 639-3 codes accepted for GPT-4o-based models

Max output 2K 2K

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: GPT-4o Transcribe · GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below; the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.audio.transcriptions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-transcribe",
    # model="gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    file=open("meeting.mp3", "rb"),
    language="en",
)
print(resp.text)

Get your API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Transcribe or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize?

GPT-4o Transcribe is cheaper on the "Audio input / 1M tokens" row ($6 vs $6.25, 1.0× apart). Other rows may point the other way; the table above carries the full rate card, and real cost depends on your mix.

Can I A/B test GPT-4o Transcribe against GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key. Switching is a one-line change to the model id, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Do GPT-4o Transcribe and GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize support speaker diarization?

The capability table above answers this per model, straight from each vendor’s documentation. Diarization, streaming and timestamps are listed separately because models differ on all three.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies