New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize vs Seed ASR

vs

Which one, when

These bill in different units - gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize at $6.25 per million audio input tokens plus $2.5 per million text tokens, seed-asr-bigmodel at a flat $0.002 per audio minute - so no single conversion between them is honest. Both diarize: seed-asr-bigmodel takes files up to 5 hours and 512MB with word-level timestamps, against a 25MB cap and a required chunking_strategy above 30 seconds on the OpenAI side. Pick gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize for diarized_json inside an OpenAI-shaped pipeline, seed-asr-bigmodel for long recordings billed by the minute.

Pricing

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize Seed ASR Δ
Per audio minute - $0.002 -
Audio input / 1M tokens $6.25 - -
Text output / 1M tokens $2.5 - -

These two models bill in different units, so no Δ is shown. Converting between them would require an assumption we have not measured. Each rate card is listed in its own unit above.

Capabilities

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize Seed ASR
Speaker diarization yes yes
Streaming yes yes
Timestamps yes yes

Specs

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize Seed ASR
Input modalities text audio audio
Output modalities text text
Released 2025-10 2025-12-05
Knowledge cutoff 2024-06 -
Limits

mp3/mp4/mpeg/mpga/m4a/wav/webm, up to 25MB

built-in speaker diarization with diarized_json output (speaker labels + segment timestamps)

chunking_strategy required for audio >30s

no prompt support

Async audio-file mode: <512MB, <5 hours, OPUS/WAV/MP3/SPX/OGG/AMR/AAC/M4A (raw PCM also accepted), results returned within 3 hours and retained 7 days

speaker diarization via enable_speaker_info (audio-file API only, best with <=10 speakers, no diarization on the streaming API)

sentence + word segmentation with start_time/end_time via show_utterances

language identification via enable_lid

hotwords/context up to 800 tokens and 20 rounds

per-call billing

Languages

57 languages listed for the transcriptions endpoint (one shared list for all transcription models)

ISO 639-1 / 639-3 codes accepted for GPT-4o-based models

With `language` empty the model covers Mandarin, English, Cantonese, Shanghainese, Minnan, Sichuan and Shaanxi dialects

39 language keys can be pinned explicitly (en-US, zh-CN, yue-CN, ja-JP, ko-KR, id-ID, es-MX, pt-BR, de-DE, fr-FR, fil-PH, ms-MY, th-TH, ar-SA, it-IT, bn-BD, el-GR, nl-NL, ru-RU, tr-TR, vi-VN, pl-PL, ro-RO, uk-UA, az-AZ, bg-BG, cs-CZ, da-DK, fi-FI, hi-IN, hu-HU, kk-KZ, km-KH, my-MM, no-NO, pa-PK, sv-SE, sw-KE, ur-PK), plus optional auto-detection (enable_auto_lang)

Max output 2K -

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize · Seed ASR

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below; the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.audio.transcriptions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize",
    # model="seed-asr-bigmodel",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    file=open("meeting.mp3", "rb"),
    language="en",
)
print(resp.text)

Get your API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Seed ASR?

They bill in different units, so there is no single honest number: GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize and Seed ASR each appear in their own unit in the table above. Compare them on your own workload; the practical trade-off is described in the verdict at the top of this page.

Can I A/B test GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize against Seed ASR without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key. Switching is a one-line change to the model id, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Do GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize and Seed ASR support speaker diarization?

The capability table above answers this per model, straight from each vendor’s documentation. Diarization, streaming and timestamps are listed separately because models differ on all three.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies