New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

GLM-5.1 vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 has been retired from our catalogue. Its figures below are the last published rates; calls to it are no longer served, while the other model in this comparison is.

vs

Which one, when

minimax-m3 is the broader and cheaper of the two on paper: a 1000000-token context against 200000, 524288 max output tokens against 131072, image and video input alongside text, and roughly 4.7x lower input and about 3.7x lower output pricing ($0.3/$1.2 per million versus $1.4/$4.4). Pick minimax-m3 for huge documents, very long generations, or any request carrying images or video; pick glm-5.1 when you specifically want Z.ai's text model and its 200000-token window is enough. Both cover chat, code, reasoning, tools and long-context, and both let you turn thinking off.

Pricing

GLM-5.1 MiniMax M3 Δ
Input / 1M tokens $1.4 $0.3 4.7×
Output / 1M tokens $4.4 $1.2 3.7×
Cache read / 1M tokens $0.26 $0.06 4.3×
Cache write - no separate charge -

Rates from the live catalogue at build time; each model page carries the current rate card.

Where they sit · input price per 1M tokens across all 76 chat models on this billing unit (log scale)

GLM-5.1 · $1.4 MiniMax M3 · $0.3
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

Capabilities

GLM-5.1 MiniMax M3
Tool calling yes yes
Thinking control configurable configurable
Structured output yes -
Prompt caching implicit (automatic) implicit (automatic)
Cache lifetime not published not published
Minimum cached prefix not published 512 tokens

Specs

GLM-5.1 MiniMax M3
Input modalities text text image video
Output modalities text text
Released 2026-04-07 2026-06-01
Context window 200K 1M
Max output 131K 524K
Thinking parameter thinking.type
  • thinking.type
  • reasoning_split
Accepted values
thinking.type
  • enabled
  • disabled
thinking.type
  • adaptive
  • disabled
reasoning_split
  • boolean
Default enabled, and the model automatically determines whether to think adaptive: thinking on, with the model deciding when extra reasoning helps

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: GLM-5.1 · MiniMax M3

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below; the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="glm-5.1",
    # model="minimax-m3",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

Get your API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on the "Input / 1M tokens" row ($0.3 vs $1.4, 4.7× apart). Other rows may point the other way; the table above carries the full rate card, and real cost depends on your mix.

Can I A/B test GLM-5.1 against MiniMax M3 without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key. Switching is a one-line change to the model id, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Do GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M3 support prompt caching?

Yes. Both bill cache reads below their input rate, so warm-prefix workloads cost less than the list rates suggest. The exact cache-read rows are in the pricing table above.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies