New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 has been retired from our catalogue. Its figures below are the last published rates; calls to it are no longer served, while the other model in this comparison is.

vs

Which one, when

Both share a 1,000,000-token context window and accept image input alongside text, so the split is mostly price, output length, and modality: claude-sonnet-5 costs about 6.7x more on input ($2 vs $0.3 per million) and about 8.3x more on output ($10 vs $1.2), with cache reads at $0.2 against $0.06. Pick minimax-m3 for high-volume or long-context work, for video input, or when you need single responses beyond 128000 tokens, since it allows up to 524288. Pick claude-sonnet-5 when you want Anthropic's toggleable thinking and explicit reasoning capability with a January 2026 knowledge cutoff.

Benchmarks

MiniMax M3: the vendor has not published benchmark scores.

Above averageNo peer higherClaude Sonnet 54 / 221 / 22
Claude Sonnet 5 MiniMax M3 other models measured peer average ★ no peer scored higher
DeepSWE 1.1
53.8%
N/A
BioMysteryBench hard
34.1%
N/A
OSWorld 2.0 Partial score, batch tool enabled
42.6%
N/A
Finance Agent v2
53.9%
N/A
Harvey Lab-AA
90.1%
N/A
HLE-Verified
31%
N/A
AutomationBench
10.7%
N/A
LVBench
68.5%
N/A

Vendor-published: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic DeepSeek Google Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

Pricing

Claude Sonnet 5 MiniMax M3 Δ
Input / 1M tokens $2 $0.3 6.7×
Output / 1M tokens $10 $1.2 8.3×
Cache read / 1M tokens $0.2 $0.06 3.3×
Cache write 1.25x (5m) / 2x (1h) no separate charge -

Rates from the live catalogue at build time; each model page carries the current rate card.

Where they sit · input price per 1M tokens across all 76 chat models on this billing unit (log scale)

Claude Sonnet 5 · $2 MiniMax M3 · $0.3
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

Capabilities

Claude Sonnet 5 MiniMax M3
Tool calling yes yes
Thinking control configurable configurable
Structured output yes -
Prompt caching explicit (you mark the prefix) implicit (automatic)
Cache lifetime 5m default, 1h option not published
Minimum cached prefix 1024 tokens 512 tokens

Specs

Claude Sonnet 5 MiniMax M3
Input modalities text image text image video
Output modalities text text
Released 2026-06-30 2026-06-01
Knowledge cutoff 2026-01 -
Context window 1M 1M
Max output 128K 524K
Thinking parameter
  • thinking.type "adaptive"
  • output_config.effort
  • thinking.type
  • reasoning_split
Accepted values
thinking.type
  • adaptive
  • disabled
effort
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max

"enabled" returns 400

thinking.type
  • adaptive
  • disabled
reasoning_split
  • boolean
Default

thinking on (adaptive)

effort
  • high
adaptive: thinking on, with the model deciding when extra reasoning helps

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: Claude Sonnet 5 · MiniMax M3

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below; the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-5",
    # model="minimax-m3",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

Get your API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on the "Input / 1M tokens" row ($0.3 vs $2, 6.7× apart). Other rows may point the other way; the table above carries the full rate card, and real cost depends on your mix.

Can I A/B test Claude Sonnet 5 against MiniMax M3 without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key. Switching is a one-line change to the model id, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Do Claude Sonnet 5 and MiniMax M3 support prompt caching?

Yes. Both bill cache reads below their input rate, so warm-prefix workloads cost less than the list rates suggest. The exact cache-read rows are in the pricing table above.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies