New Sign up free, 10 calls on us. Up to $1, no card needed.

Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 has been retired from our catalogue. Its figures below are the last published rates; calls to it are no longer served, while the other model in this comparison is.

vs

Which one, when

Both share a 1000000-token context window and accept text and image input, so the split is cost and shape: minimax-m3 runs $0.3 input and $1.2 output against $5 and $25 for claude-opus-5, roughly 16x and 20x cheaper, and it also takes video input with a 524288-token max output. Pick claude-opus-5 when you want its explicit thinking capability (which can be disabled) and its Anthropic tool and code stack on high-value work; pick minimax-m3 for video-in, very long generations, or high-volume reasoning where the $0.06 cache-read rate matters.

Benchmarks

MiniMax M3: the vendor has not published benchmark scores.

Above averageNo peer higherClaude Opus 538 / 468 / 46
Claude Opus 5 MiniMax M3 other models measured peer average ★ no peer scored higher
DeepSWE 1.1
68.8%
N/A
BioMysteryBench hard
49.4%
N/A
OSWorld 2.0
no peer scored higher 70.6%
N/A
ExploitBench (Cap%)
70%
N/A
HealthBench Professional
59.8%
N/A
Finance Agent v2
58.6%
N/A
Legal Agent Benchmark
6.7%
N/A
GPQA Diamond
93.4%
N/A
BrowseComp
90.8%
N/A
LVBench
75.4%
N/A

Vendor-published: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic ByteDance DeepSeek Google MiniMax Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

Pricing

Claude Opus 5 MiniMax M3 Δ
Input / 1M tokens $5 $0.3 17×
Output / 1M tokens $25 $1.2 21×
Cache read / 1M tokens $0.5 $0.06 8.3×
Cache write 1.25x (5m) / 2x (1h) no separate charge -

Rates from the live catalogue at build time; each model page carries the current rate card.

Where they sit · input price per 1M tokens across all 76 chat models on this billing unit (log scale)

Claude Opus 5 · $5 MiniMax M3 · $0.3
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

Capabilities

Claude Opus 5 MiniMax M3
Tool calling yes yes
Thinking control configurable configurable
Structured output yes -
Prompt caching explicit (you mark the prefix) implicit (automatic)
Cache lifetime 5m default, 1h option not published
Minimum cached prefix 1024 tokens 512 tokens

Specs

Claude Opus 5 MiniMax M3
Input modalities text image text image video
Output modalities text text
Released 2026-07-24 2026-06-01
Knowledge cutoff 2026-05 -
Context window 1M 1M
Max output 128K 524K
Thinking parameter
  • thinking.type
  • output_config.effort
  • thinking.type
  • reasoning_split
Accepted values
thinking.type
  • adaptive
  • disabled
effort
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
thinking.type
  • adaptive
  • disabled
reasoning_split
  • boolean
Default

thinking on

effort
  • high (Claude API and Claude Code)
adaptive: thinking on, with the model deciding when extra reasoning helps

Specs are transcribed from each vendor’s documentation; a row a vendor does not publish is left out rather than inferred. Full sources: Claude Opus 5 · MiniMax M3

Switch between them with one line

Both ids are in every tab below; the highlighted pair of lines is the only edit. Same endpoint, same key, same request shape.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-opus-5",
    # model="minimax-m3",  # uncomment this line, comment the one above
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

Get your API key →

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on the "Input / 1M tokens" row ($0.3 vs $5, 17× apart). Other rows may point the other way; the table above carries the full rate card, and real cost depends on your mix.

Can I A/B test Claude Opus 5 against MiniMax M3 without two integrations?

Yes. Both are served through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint with one API key. Switching is a one-line change to the model id, so you can route a fraction of traffic to each and compare bills directly.

Do Claude Opus 5 and MiniMax M3 support prompt caching?

Yes. Both bill cache reads below their input rate, so warm-prefix workloads cost less than the list rates suggest. The exact cache-read rows are in the pricing table above.

Related comparisons

From our measured studies