GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna

vs

什么时候选哪个

两者的输出成本同为每百万 $0.5,因此区别在于输入和控制:gpt-6-luna 支持文本和图像,每百万 $0.1,缓存读取为 $0.01,而 glm-5.3-flash 的输入收费是其 1.5x,缓存读取是其 3x,分别为 $0.15 和 $0.03。当你在文本和图像之外还需要视频输入,或者需要高达 163840 token 的长单次回复空间时,请选择 glm-5.3-flash。如果你需要进行成本低廉、高度依赖缓存的文本和图像任务,需要稍大的 1050000 token 上下文,以及关闭推理的选项,请选择 gpt-6-luna。

Benchmark 成绩

高于同类均值无更高分GLM-5.3-Flash4 / 61 / 6GPT-6 Luna仅 1 项可比
GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-6 Luna 其他参测模型 同类均值 ★ 没有模型得分更高
DeepSWE 1.1
63.4%
66.6%
GDPval-AA v2 Elo · 1504-1773 据 Z.ai 公布 · 2026-09-04
没有模型得分更高 1773
N/A
Humanity's Last Exam with tools
55.3%
N/A
Agents' Last Exam
26.3%
N/A

供应商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic DeepSeek Google Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

价格

GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-6 Luna Δ
输入 / 1M token $0.15 $0.1 1.5×
输出 / 1M token $0.5 $0.5 =
缓存读取 / 1M token $0.03 $0.01 3×
缓存写入 - 1.25x (30m) / 2.5x (12h) -

价格取自构建时的实时目录,最新价格见各模型页面。

两个模型所处的位置:全部 83 个按同一单位计费的聊天模型的每 1M token 输入价分布(对数刻度)

GLM-5.3-Flash · $0.15 GPT-6 Luna · $0.1
$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

能力

GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-6 Luna
工具调用 是 是
思考控制 始终开启 可配置
结构化输出 是 是
提示词缓存 隐式(自动) 隐式 + 显式
缓存有效期 未公布 at least 30m by default, 12h option on the Responses API
最小缓存前缀 未公布 1,024 个 token

规格

GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-6 Luna
输入模态 文本 图像 视频 文本 图像
输出模态 文本 文本
发布日期 2026-08-26 2026-09-22
知识截止日期 - 2026-05
上下文窗口 1M 1.1M
最大输出 164K 128K
思考参数 reasoning_effort reasoning.effort
可选值
reasoning_effort
  • low
  • high
  • max
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
默认值 max medium

规格照录自各供应商的文档;供应商没有公布的项目,对应的行直接省略,不做推断。 完整来源: GLM-5.3-Flash · GPT-6 Luna

同一条提示词,两个模型,经网关实测

提示词 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 检查 恰好 3 句

GLM-5.3-Flash 通过 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning means the model now generates thousands of invisible "thinking" tokens before each visible answer, and we're billed for those hidden tokens at full output rates—our most expensive tier. Since output tokens cost 3–5x more than input tokens, that hidden thinking volume compounds across every request, which is why the bill doubled rather than edged up. If the spend concerns you, the fix is straightforward: route only complex queries to reasoning models and keep simple tasks on standard ones, which can reclaim a meaningful share of that cost without losing accuracy where it matters.

输出 742 tok (+626 思考) 延迟 23.2 s

GPT-6 Luna 通过 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning typically makes the model process more information and generate more internal tokens before producing its answer. Because usage is billed by tokens—and reasoning may also route requests to a more expensive model—the cost per request can rise sharply. If request volume stayed similar, that higher cost per request could explain why the bill doubled.

输出 117 tok (+48 思考) 延迟 3.4 s

指令遵循(恰好三句,数得出来)、受众适配(对 CFO 说话的口吻),以及下方 token 计数暴露出的隐藏思考计费差额。

提示词 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 检查 修复通过测试

GLM-5.3-Flash 通过 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 best = max(best, cur) else: cur = 1 return best ``` **The bug:** `cur` is supposed to hold the length of the current run, but it's seeded with `0` and reset to `0` on a mismatch instead of `1` — and since the loop starts at index 1, the first element of every run never passes through the `==` branch and so never gets counted at all. That means `cur` actually holds *run length minus 1* for every run, so every run is underreported by one: a single-element input never enters the loop and returns 0 instead of 1, and a run of length n returns n − 1 (e.g., `[3, 3, 3]` returns 2). […]

输出 2462 tok (+2138 思考) 延迟 29.1 s

GPT-6 Luna 通过 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The original code counted matching *adjacent pairs* rather than items, so a run of length `n` was reported as `n - 1`, and a single-item input returned `0`. This version counts the current item as part of each run and updates `best` at every index, including the last; it returns `0` for an empty input.

输出 514 tok (+356 思考) 延迟 6.9 s

修复是否真的正确(能运行)、解释的信息密度,以及在一个范围明确的任务上的 token 效率。

提示词 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 检查 合法 JSON,严格符合 schema

GLM-5.3-Flash 通过 · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending the Q4 close"

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "September quarter", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": "Withheld pending the Q4 close" } ``` Notes on judgment calls: revenue of 412 is on a constant-currency basis as stated; growth of "eleven and change" is approximated as 11 since no precise figure is given.

输出 717 tok (+616 思考) 延迟 9.1 s

GPT-6 Luna 通过 · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending the Q4 close"

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":412,"growth_pct":null,"guidance":"Withheld pending the Q4 close"}

输出 161 tok (+119 思考) 延迟 21.7 s

是否严守 schema(不臆造字段)、能否顶住幻觉压力(原文明说暂不给出 guidance),以及结构化输出路径的差异。

提示词 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 检查 120 词,0 个禁用词

GLM-5.3-Flash 通过 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Introducing Cross-Provider Prompt Cache, the newest feature in our API gateway. Today, teams send identical prompts to multiple LLM providers and pay full price each time. Why duplicate that work and cost? With Cross-Provider Prompt Cache, your gateway stores prompt-response pairs and serves repeated requests from cache, regardless of which provider handles the call. The result: lower latency, reduced spend, and consistent outputs across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and self-hosted models. Configure cache policies per route, set TTLs, and invalidate entries instantly through the dashboard or API. Built-in analytics show hit rates and savings in real time. Enable the cache with a single flag, no code changes required. Available today on all paid plans. Contact sales for enterprise volume pricing details.

输出 2095 tok (+1937 思考) 延迟 20.2 s

GPT-6 Luna 通过 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Introducing Prompt Cache, a new API gateway feature that recognizes repeat prompt prefixes and reuses provider-side cached context across supported models. Teams can route requests to different AI providers while preserving eligible cache hits, reducing redundant input processing and helping lower latency and token costs. Configure cache policies in one place, monitor hit rates by provider, and keep existing client integrations unchanged. The gateway applies provider-specific rules automatically, so developers do not need to build separate caching logic for each endpoint. Which workflows could benefit from faster responses and predictable spend? Prompt Cache is available today in preview for eligible accounts, with usage details, supported providers, and setup guidance in the dashboard. Start with one route, compare results, then expand.

输出 959 tok (+813 思考) 延迟 14.6 s

是否守住约束(字数预算、禁用词表、只能有一个问句)、文风特征,以及长度控制。

改一行代码就能在两个模型之间切换

下方每个标签页里都有两个模型 ID,高亮的那两行是唯一要改的地方。端点不变,API key 不变,请求结构也不变。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="glm-5.3-flash",
    # model="gpt-6-luna",  # 取消注释此行,注释上一行
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

获取 API key →

常见问题

GLM-5.3-Flash 和 GPT-6 Luna 哪个更便宜?

按「输入 / 1M token」算,GPT-6 Luna 更便宜($0.1 对 $0.15,相差 1.5×)。其他计费项的结论可能相反,完整价格见上方表格,实际成本取决于你的用量构成。

不用分别集成两次,就能对 GLM-5.3-Flash 和 GPT-6 Luna 做 A/B 测试吗?

可以。两个模型走同一个 OpenAI 兼容端点,用同一个 API key,切换时只要改一行里的模型名,所以可以给两个模型各分一部分流量,直接对比账单。

GLM-5.3-Flash 和 GPT-6 Luna 支持提示词缓存吗?

支持。两个模型的缓存读取价都低于各自的输入价,所以前缀能反复命中缓存的负载,实际成本会比按官网价估算的低。具体的缓存读取价见上方价格表。

相关对比

我们的实测研究