新帳號 免費註冊,送 10 次呼叫,最高 $1,免綁卡。

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

vs

什麼情況選哪一個

這兩者非常接近:都接受文字和影像輸入、回傳文字、最大輸出 128000 token,且每百萬輸入 token 都收 $5、快取讀取 $0.5,所以差別在輸出側——claude-opus-5 每百萬 $25,對比 gpt-5.6-sol 的 $30,生成 token 上相差 1.2 倍。長而輸出密集的推理工作選 claude-opus-5,它明確的思考能力和較晚的 2026-05 知識截止有幫助;想要略大的 1050000 token 脈絡或它宣告的視覺處理則選 gpt-5.6-sol。兩者都能關閉思考。

Benchmark 成績

領先高於平均沒有模型更高Claude Opus 53038 / 468 / 46GPT-5.6 Sol1494 / 12128 / 121

兩邊都有成績的有 45 項,其中 1 項平手。

Claude Opus 5 GPT-5.6 Sol 其他有成績的模型 其他模型平均 ★ 沒有模型分數更高
DeepSWE 1.1
68.8%
72.7%
BioMysteryBench hard
49.4%
44.7%
OSWorld 2.0
沒有模型分數更高 70.6%
62.6%
ExploitBench (Cap%)
70%
78.5%
HealthBench Professional
59.8%
60.5%
Finance Agent v2
58.6%
53.8%
Legal Agent Benchmark
6.7%
2.5%
GPQA Diamond
93.4%
94.6%
BrowseComp
90.8%
90.4%
LVBench
75.4%
82.1%

供應商公布: Alibaba (Qwen) Anthropic ByteDance DeepSeek Google MiniMax Moonshot OpenAI Tencent Z.ai

定價

Claude Opus 5 GPT-5.6 Sol Δ
輸入 / 1M tokens $5 $5 =
輸出 / 1M tokens $25 $30 0.83×
快取讀取 / 1M tokens $0.5 $0.5 =
快取寫入 1.25x (5m) / 2x (1h) 不額外計費 -

費率取自網站建置時的即時目錄;各模型頁面都列有最新的價目。

兩者的相對位置:每 1M tokens 的輸入價格,涵蓋同一計費單位下全部 76 個聊天模型(對數尺度)

$0.05 · Qwen3 VL Flash $30 · GPT-5.4 Pro

功能

Claude Opus 5 GPT-5.6 Sol
工具使用 是 是
思考控制 可設定 可設定
結構化輸出 是 是
提示詞快取 顯式(由你標記前綴) 隱式(自動)
快取存活時間 5m default, 1h option 5-10m, up to 1h
最小快取前綴 1024 個 token 1024 個 token

規格

Claude Opus 5 GPT-5.6 Sol
輸入模態 文字 圖像 文字 圖像
輸出模態 文字 文字
發布日期 2026-07-24 2026-07-09
知識截止日期 2026-05 2026-02
上下文視窗 1M 1.1M
最大輸出 128K 128K
思考參數
  • thinking.type
  • output_config.effort
reasoning.effort
可接受的值
thinking.type
  • adaptive
  • disabled
effort
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
reasoning.effort
  • none
  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • xhigh
  • max
預設值

thinking on

effort
  • high (Claude API and Claude Code)
medium

規格摘錄自各供應商的文件;供應商沒有公布的項目就直接略過,不自行推測。 完整來源: Claude Opus 5 · GPT-5.6 Sol

同一段提示詞,兩個模型,經閘道實測

提示詞 Explain to a CFO, in exactly three sentences, why our LLM bill doubled after we enabled reasoning. 檢查 恰好 3 句

Claude Opus 5 通過 · 3 sentences

When reasoning is enabled, the model generates a hidden chain of "thinking" tokens before it writes the visible answer, and those internal tokens are billed at the output rate even though no one ever sees them — commonly 3–10x more tokens than the response itself. Because output tokens are priced several times higher than input tokens, that added volume hits us at our most expensive rate, which is why the bill roughly doubled while our request count stayed flat. The spend is controllable: we can cap the reasoning budget per call, route only genuinely hard requests to reasoning mode and cheaper models for the rest, and track cost per successfully completed task rather than cost per token, since a single correct answer usually beats three cheap retries plus human cleanup.

輸出 529 tok 延遲 9.0 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 3 sentences

Enabling reasoning makes the model generate additional internal tokens before producing an answer, so each request consumes more billable compute. Reasoning may also increase response length, latency, tool calls, and retries, further raising per-request cost. In short, usage volume may be unchanged, but the cost per task increased enough to double the bill.

輸出 111 tok (+34 思考) 延遲 2.3 s

是否照指令做(剛好三句,數得出來)、語氣是否貼合對象(寫給 CFO 看),以及下方 token 計量顯示出的隱藏思考計費落差。

提示詞 This function is supposed to return the longest run of consecutive equal items, but callers report it is off by one on single-element inputs and misses runs that end at the last index. Fix it and explain the bug in one paragraph. 檢查 修正後通過測試

Claude Opus 5 通過 · 8/8 cases

## Fixed version ```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = 1 cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 if cur > best: best = cur return best ``` ## The bug The counters were tracking the wrong quantity: `cur` counted *matching adjacent pairs* rather than *elements in the current run*, and both counters started at `0` instead of `1`. Since a run of length *n* contains only *n − 1* adjacent equal pairs, every result came back one too small — `[1, 1]` returned 1, `[3, 3, 3]` returned 2 — and a single-element list returned 0 because the loop body never executed and `best` kept its initial value of `0`. […]

輸出 1094 tok 延遲 16.1 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 8/8 cases

```python def longest_run(xs): if not xs: return 0 best = cur = 1 for i in range(1, len(xs)): if xs[i] == xs[i - 1]: cur += 1 else: cur = 1 best = max(best, cur) return best ``` The original function counted equal *adjacencies* rather than items, so a run of length one produced `0` and every longer run was undercounted by one. Initializing `cur` and `best` to `1` for nonempty input makes them represent item counts, resetting `cur` to `1` starts a new run at the current item, and updating `best` on every iteration ensures a run reaching the final index is included.

輸出 316 tok (+135 思考) 延遲 5.2 s

修正是否真的正確(跑得起來)、說明的資訊密度,以及在範圍明確的任務上的 token 效率。

提示詞 Extract a JSON object with fields {company, quarter, revenue_usd_m, growth_pct, guidance} from this text. Use null for anything not stated; add no other fields. 檢查 有效的 JSON,完全符合 schema

Claude Opus 5 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "Withheld pending Q4 close"

```json { "company": "Meridian Robotics", "quarter": "Q3", "revenue_usd_m": 412, "growth_pct": 11, "guidance": "Withheld pending Q4 close" } ``` Notes on judgment calls: - **quarter**: "September quarter" is labeled Q3 because the text refers to an upcoming "Q4 close," implying a calendar-aligned fiscal year. No fiscal year is given. - **revenue_usd_m**: 412 is stated as constant-currency and hedged ("call it"), so it's approximate; the currency is not explicitly stated as USD. - **growth_pct**: "up eleven and change" means slightly more than 11, so 11 is a floor rather than an exact figure.

輸出 539 tok 延遲 7.6 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 5/5 fields, guidance "withheld pending the Q4 close"

{"company":"Meridian Robotics","quarter":"September quarter","revenue_usd_m":412,"growth_pct":"11+","guidance":"withheld pending the Q4 close"}

輸出 194 tok (+147 思考) 延遲 3.2 s

是否遵守 schema(不自創欄位)、面對幻覺誘因的表現(題目明確不給 guidance),以及結構化輸出路徑的差異。

提示詞 Write a 120-word product announcement for an API gateway feature that caches prompts across providers. Forbidden words: "seamless", "unlock", "game-changer", "revolutionize", "empower". Exactly one sentence must be a question. 檢查 120 詞,0 個禁用詞

Claude Opus 5 通過 · 123 words, 0 banned, 1 question

**Cross-Provider Prompt Caching** We're introducing Cross-Provider Prompt Caching in the API Gateway. Repeated system prompts, long documents, and few-shot examples are stored once at the gateway layer and reused across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and self-hosted models. Instead of paying full input token costs on every request, your application sends a cache reference, and the gateway rehydrates the context before forwarding it downstream. Why does that matter? Teams running high-volume agents and retrieval pipelines typically see input token spend fall 40 to 70 percent, with median latency dropping by several hundred milliseconds. Caches are scoped per project, encrypted at rest, and invalidated automatically when a prompt template changes. Enable it with a single header, and see the docs for TTL tuning and per-route controls.

輸出 1593 tok 延遲 19.1 s

GPT-5.6 Sol 通過 · 120 words, 0 banned, 1 question

Today, we’re introducing Provider Prompt Cache, a new API gateway feature that reuses prompt prefixes across supported AI providers, reducing latency, token costs, and duplicated processing. Teams can define cache policies once, route requests dynamically, and preserve provider flexibility without rewriting application logic. Switching models during testing or failover? The gateway identifies eligible prompt segments, applies provider-specific caching controls, and reports hits, misses, savings, and expiration details through unified logs and metrics. Configurable TTLs, tenant isolation, encryption, and cache-bypass options help teams balance performance, privacy, and freshness for every workload. Provider Prompt Cache is available today in beta through the dashboard and API, with SDK examples and migration guidance included. […]

輸出 733 tok (+564 思考) 延遲 7.7 s

是否遵守限制(字數上限、禁用詞清單、只能有一句問句)、文字風格的特徵,以及長度控制。

改一行程式碼就能在兩者之間切換

下面每個頁籤都列了這兩個模型 ID,要改的只有醒目標示的那兩行。端點、金鑰和請求格式都不變。

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://synthorai.io/v1",
    api_key="sk-syn-...",
)

resp = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-opus-5",
    # model="gpt-5.6-sol",  # 取消這一行的註解,並把上一行註解掉
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this diff"}],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
)
print(resp.choices[0].message.content)

取得 API 金鑰 →

常見問題

Claude Opus 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol 哪個比較便宜?

兩者的「輸入 / 1M tokens」相同($5),這一項分不出高下,請看下方的規格與功能。

可以只串接一次,就對 Claude Opus 5 和 GPT-5.6 Sol 做 A/B 測試嗎?

可以。兩個模型都走同一個 OpenAI 相容端點,用的也是同一把 API 金鑰,切換時只要改一行裡的模型名稱字串。你可以把一部分流量分別導到兩邊,再直接比較帳單。

Claude Opus 5 與 GPT-5.6 Sol 支援提示詞快取嗎?

支援。兩者的快取讀取費率都低於輸入費率,所以前綴已經進快取的工作負載,實際成本會比官網價算出來的低。確切的快取讀取價格請見上方定價表。

相關比較